blog Computer Music Featured Features gear John Chowning Max Mathews Stanford Yamaha DX7

Black Ice: The Science of the Yamaha DX7

Launched in 1983 and nonetheless an element of music studios worldwide: the Yamaha DX7 is the very definition of a basic.

In the trendy era of computer-generated and synthesized sound, it’s unlikely there’ll ever again be an instrument as ubiquitous as the Yamaha DX7. What the guitar was to rock, the DX7 was to an entire decade of music from a dozen totally different genres, taking root in ’80s pop and New Wave, seeding the new genres of home and techno and undermining even the guitar in its infiltration of common music.

Yamaha’s DX7 was the first mass marketed synthesizer which was additionally used by professional musicians. Its reputation by this point is nearly a cliché: it bought more than 200,000 models, and its domination of the charts in the ’80s makes it harder to seek out Prime 40 hits that didn’t embrace a DX7 after sorting by way of the tons of that did. When individuals mention a generalized “1980s sound,” they’re virtually invariably talking about sounds made by this one keyboard: the Yamaha DX7.

Because of some intelligent engineering and even smarter licensing deals, Yamaha virtually cornered the market on “owning” this sound for almost 20 years. That is unheard of in the business, the place any new sound that catches the public’s ear is nearly instantly cloned. In the case of the DX7, its wealthy, crystalline sounds have been generated utilizing a groundbreaking technique of digital synthesis coated underneath patent. The keyboard that gave a romantic sheen to A-Ha and was mastered by Brian Eno was also powered by one of the most precious (non-pharma) analysis patents in history.


Frequency modulation synthesis, or FM Synthesis, was found not by an engineer however a composer. John Chowning was born in 1934 in Salem, New Jersey and studied violin and percussion (each of which he would make considerable use of) after a stint in the US Navy. After learning composition and principle in Paris, he attained a Grasp of Arts degree and the title of Doctor of Musical Arts from Stanford in 1966.

Learn More: Magic Box: The History of the MPC

Chowning’s interest in pc music made him a acknowledged pioneer of digital music, which at the time was a preoccupation of both the crazy-haired weirdos who made music and the different crazy-haired weirdos who made computer systems. In 1964, he started research on the motion of sounds in area using Max Mathews’ MUSIC IV software program (developed at Bell Labs, MUSIC was the first extensively used program for generating sound). Stanford at the time had no analog synthesis gear, however it did have a large mainframe pc, and its famous Artificial Intelligence Lab was established in 1965. This lead to Chowning’s curiosity in digital synthesis:

“In about 1970 I remembered some work that Jean-Claude Risset had done at Bell Labs, using a computer to analyze and resynthesize trumpet tones. One of the things that he realized in that work is that there is a definite correlation between the growth of intensity during the attack portion of a brass tone and the growth of the bandwidth of the signal. For the first few milliseconds, what energy is there is mostly around the fundamental; and quickly, as the intensity grows during the next 30 or 40 milliseconds, more and more harmonics appear at a successively higher volume. I thought about that, and I realized that I could do something similar with simple FM, just by using the intensity envelope as a modulation index. That was the moment when I realized that the technique was really of some consequence, because with just two oscillators I was able to produce tones that had a richness and quality about them that was attractive to the ear – sounds which by other means were quite complicated to create.”

In FM Synthesis, one waveform is altered by modulating its frequency with a second waveform, resulting in a more complicated sound. Via FM Synthesis, Chowning was capable of develop a variety of complicated, wealthy sounds, including emulating acoustic instruments and even the human voice (an area of specific interest to Chowning).

Max Mathews was impressed by Chowning’s discovery and inspired his analysis, however Stanford have been the ones who sniffed out the business prospects. Organ manufacturers confirmed some curiosity in FM Synthesis, however their engineers decided it wasn’t sensible. “They were into analog technology, and had no idea what I was talking about,” Chowning later remarked.

Yamaha at the time was the largest producer of musical instruments in the world, but was small participant in the US market. A graduate scholar from Stanford Business Faculty researched the company and, as luck would have it, one of their chief engineers was visiting their American department in Buena Park, California at the time. Arriving at Stanford, “in ten minutes” he understood what Chowning’s analysis meant.


Yamaha put “a few good people” engaged on FM Synthesis immediately. Chowning had filed a patent for FM, and Yamaha licensed it in either 1974 or 1975 (recollections differ). The patent for FM synthesis turned a money cow for Stanford, yielding $20 million before it expired. In 1994 it was stated to be “the second most lucrative licensing agreement” in Stanford’s slightly extraordinary research historical past.

Apparently, the DX7 was not the first implementation of FM Synthesis. In truth, the first instrument to make use of it wasn’t made by Yamaha at all. The Synclavier I, made by New England Digital Corporation in 1978, included a digital synthesizer powered by an FM synthesis algorithm licensed from Yamaha.

Learn Extra: 808: The History of an Error

The first Yamaha synthesizer using FM Synthesis was the Yamaha GS1, which shipped in 1981. It was cumbersome, expensive to fabricate and likewise priced approach beyond what most musicians might afford – some $13,000. This was because of the giant number of chips required for digital synthesis. “The GS1 was probably one generation of chip technology older,” Chowning stated, “so they had to use many more chips than they ended up using in the DX7 – something like 50 to 2. Of course, that’s not a one-to-one correspondence in power, but it’s not too far off.”

While Yamaha was figuring out easy methods to implement FM Synthesis, they have been additionally creating their own chips. “It was the convergence of these two independent projects that resulted in the first practical instrument, which was the DX7,” Chowning stated.

Yamaha’s improvement of FM Synthesis additionally impressed Chowning. Their implementation of the algorithms have been things that have been “not quite straightforward in the way one would usually work on a computer,” but result in higher effectivity and velocity. This gave the bandwith of the DX7 what Chowning referred to as “a really brilliant kind of sound. I guess there’s something like a 57kHz sampling rate in the DAC [digital-to-analog converter]. The result is far better than we can get with equivalent density on our digital synthesizer here at Stanford. When we are running 96 oscillators, which is what the DX7 has, we have a maximum sampling rate of around 25kHz to 30kHz. That’s only about 12kHz or 13kHz effective bandwidth. The DX7 is better than that, and I think it’s quite noticeable.”


Among the some ways by which the Yamaha DX7 changed the panorama of music, much less acknowledged is the means it modified the language. Previous to 1983, “keyboard” was regularly (and correctly) used to discuss with the physical keys themselves and the area they occupied as a element of a larger instrument, similar to a synthesizer or electrical piano. After 1983, “keyboard” turned synonymous with the instrument as an entire. The truth is, Yamaha needed the keys to be the fundamental function of the DX7, which might draw musicians to succeed in out and start to play without studying a guide first. They designed a “simple, square form that would be a vivid contrast to analog synthesizers and their panels crowded with buttons and knobs.” Yamaha’s designers intentionally eliminated other physical controllers, leaving membrane switches for all different points of operation.

The choice to take away the knobs simplified the interface but made the DX7 a chore to program, with the membrane switches used to scroll by way of a dizzying labyrinth of menus seen by way of the window of its tiny LED show. Brian Eno studied it with a scientific concentration and managed to make the DX7 do things that no one might consider, but many have been happy to make use of the presets. For a synthesizer with sound alternately described as “cold” or “metallic,” the DX7 still did a greater job at emulating actual devices than many of its rivals.

E. PIANO 1 might be the most well-known (or infamous, relying on who’s telling the story) patch on the Yamaha DX7. By means of variations using the sustain pedal and stereo delay, E. PIANO 1 might do a fairly convincing emulation of the sound of the Fender Rhodes. A whole lot if not hundreds of house music tracks from the ’80s and ’90s substitute the DX7 for the Rhodes – it might even be conceivable that the ones with a DX7 emulation vastly outnumber the ones which used an precise Rhodes. It was also used considerably in pop as a Rhodes stand-in, resembling in Phil Collins’ “One More Night.” Clearly, Phil might have afforded a real one. For awhile, individuals just appreciated the sound of the DX7 emulating an electric piano greater than the real factor.

One other preset is as much an element of the ’80s palette as the electrical piano – that punchy DX7 bass which just about immediately evokes a want to vote for Ronald Reagan and do coke in a nightclub rest room with some man named Jeff. Paired with the scorching beats of the 808, it made for a killer combination. And regardless of the problem in programming the beats, patches proliferated – it was exceptional the limits to which creative musicians and producers might push the machine. The similar DX7 beast that fueled the excessive concept pop of Kenny Loggins and Hall & Oates also powered deep, contemplative works like Brian Eno’s Apollo and the “Theme From ‘Creation’” on Music For Movies III – extensively considered some of the most lovely music of the late 20th century.


It’s not troublesome to consider that a synthesizer that turned so ubiquitous can be subject to a backlash, and the DX7 was. It bought several hundred thousand models in the first few years – a report, as synthesizers in the previous had bought in the tons of, hundreds and infrequently tens of hundreds per model.

Round the time that Yamaha licensed FM Synthesis from Stanford, Chowning founded the Middle for Pc Research in Music and Acoustics (CCRMA) at Stanford, which is in the very brief listing of highly regarded music know-how analysis centers. The patent on FM Synthesis expired in 1995, and the know-how is now featured in many synthesizers alongside other means of synthesizing sound. Sounds from the DX7 might be emulated with software program, including “dexed,” which is obtainable free of charge.

However the durable previous machines are still churning and sometimes require much less maintenance to remain alive than many analog synthesizers. Since the DX7 was launched the similar yr as the MIDI commonplace was launched, it will possibly nonetheless take its place as an element of a contemporary studio.

And a era removed, the “sound of the ’80s” is way less omnipresent and oppressive than it once was. The DX7 has gone from world domination to toppled god to an enthralling type of ornament and immediate audio reference level in a producer’s palette.

About the author